I cannot take Kay Burley as an intelligent person, my opinion of her rated from 1-10 fell down to the lowest ever point of “2” after her performance today again with one of her slick and sick performances - this time about Angela Rayner MP of Labour Party.

Not just that Kay Burley shows how her IQ is low she is trying to make the case for Conservative Party and their friends about £3,000 which allegedly (not proved) by asking today everyone “How much trouble are Labour and Angela Rayner in”.

Well, let me tell you ****** botox women, I doubt it's very much trouble and there's a couple of problems with this story:

One of them is that it takes a very long time to explain the ins and outs of what's going on with the tax and what may have been done with the tax and many people lose interest.

The other one is that the number itself the 3000 pounds sterling is so modest when it comes to property taxation that I think a lot of people will look at it and sort of see it as proof of actually a pretty modest sort of background rather than the kind of mansion owning multiple flat renting approach that we see from others so, my very conservative answer this would probably won't do significant damage immediately however might causing a distraction for Labour when it comes to the local election campaign.

Since the police said they are investigating it has just naturally become a bit more serious because before Labour could say “Well this is just a Tory smear campaign and the police are not looking into this again despite the fact that it's so”.

I think as a result it is now more problematic for Keir Starmer, the question is what did the police find along with the HMRC investigation. However the Tories are pushing investigation on the capital gains point to keep going this for Kay Burley “Breaking News on Sky News” (disgrace and shame) for as long as possible because they are aware that Angela Rayner is one of the party's most effective communicators alongside with Wes Streeting and right now she's not able to perform that function because of this row and therefore I think that these Tory MP's that have much to be happy about at the moment and that is it.

Your second favourite question to everyone on the Sky News today was “Why did Angela not pass papers to her boss Sir Keir Starmer”. You even tried to make Catherine McKinnell MP Shadow Minister for Schools to say “Yes, I wonder why she did not ask Starmer”. But Kay Burley you failed on this one as well, once Catherine McKinnell MP said to you clearly that she is a lawyer as well and that she is not giving lawyers advice as such in her constituency. The same rules apply to Starmer. If he is the leader of the party he should concentrate on the party and not to be “legal advisor” for one individual from the labour party doesn’t matter who that person is. 

Even more, I think if Starmer would get involved, people might be thinking that he wants something to hide under the carpet and once police get involved that was the correct approach.

Kay you were making your standard antics with the shadow minister Catherine McKinnell this morning trying with the optics saying when you see the former top lawyer in the land saying “I'm not looking at that legal paperwork I'm not looking at that legal paperwork it's nothing to do with me in other words Keir Starmer her boss saying don't show me the paperwork any party would respond” but you cannot distinguish between informal and formal investigation.

Once there is an investigation there that is formal we can almost say in 99.99% that we couldn't expect anyone including Angela Rayner to comment on the ongoing investigation.

Let me remind you again that your friend Dominic Raab (former deputy PM) stated clearly on TV that there was nothing wrong with a parties at No 10 and the police are not looking into things which are over one year old. Question for you Kay: Why and how on earth are police looking into the matter which has happened in 2010 – 14 years ago, when Angela Rayner was not even MP. Shame on Tories, you Kay Burley, BBC and all others who are taking crusade on this level for £3000 (if).

You want me to go further with you Kay Burley? Sky News is said to be an "Independent" News Channel.

I very much doubt this! I can instantly disclose a minimum of 9 (nine) very questionable and dodge issues about your "independence". I got information from the person working years with you therefore you will not be able to deny or oppose any of it. I am quiet so far purely because I don't want this person to lose the job and I don't want this to happen! 

You were not bothered with Tory PPE scandals where money went in millions and not by 3000 as it is in Angela's case. Was difficult to get barones to your studio asking her where £25 million get lost or Annuziata Rees Mogg (sister of Jacob Rees-Mogg) where £20 million gone, or why you have not asked Nadhim Zahavi MP how he forgot to pay £5 million to HMRC or how many millions family of our Prime Minister benefits on non-dome status only not to mention other "family deals" including visas. But these are not the only things you should ask - why haven't you asked friend of yours Steve Barclay MP about the Tory pledge of 40 new hospitals? They are 14 years in power, how many new hospitals do we have? Or perhaps or how T Villers MP failed to declare £70,000 shares of energy giant Shell. Lists of names from the Tory party never ever ends. Will Rishi Sunak ask nation "to lent him a vote" as Boris Johnson did on his famous victory speech? 

How many Tories MP were suspended, taken whip off or are under the investigation? Let me remind you on few names of conservatives former MP's (In A-Z order):

• Andrew Bridgen
• Bob Steward
• Chris Pincher
• Crispin Blunt
• David Warburton
• Imran Ahmad Khan
• Julian Knight
• Lee Anderson
• Mark Menzies
• Matt Hancock
• Neil Parish
• Peter Bone
• Rob Roberts
• Scot Benton and
• William Wragg.

And where you are concentrated at present as your "Breaking News"? On Angela Rayner £3,000 which are still not officially confirmed either by police or even less by HMRC. 

Do you Kay still remember how your Sky News commentated Matt Hancock when he lost his whip?

Tamara (from Sky) said: "So he joined a long list of those, some with mixed success". Your presenter on that particular day (who might that be?) answer to Tamara: OK, Tamara. You might have thought, he might be a gentleman who was kind slightly wary of hidden cameras."

That is the SKY News independence news broadcaster! Ha-ha-ha said the clown!